Shakira probably twerked a few times after a $100 million lawsuit against her was thrown out. The 36-year-old new mom was sued by her ex-boyfriend Antonio de la Rua, who claimed he and Shakira made a verbal agreement in 2004, promising him a stake in her earnings because of his business dealings as well as being an adviser and strategist in her career. The son of former Argentine president Fernando de la Rua also takes credit for persuading Shakira to record the international hit "Hips Don't Lie," which she "hated" at first, and says he helped negotiate her $300 million touring deal with Live Nation.
A California judge joined previously dismissed courts in New York and Switzerland by throwing out the lawsuit, insisting the case should not be heard in California.
"I am very grateful that the courts are not allowing these groundless lawsuits to proceed," says Shakira. "I have moved on in my life and could not be happier now. I hope this harassment will now come to an end."
You may have heard about the $100 million lawsuit against Shakira that has been making headlines lately. The Colombian singer was accused of copying a famous Arab melody for her hit song ‘Loca’without giving credit or paying royalties to the original composer, Ramon Arias Vasquez.
But you’ll be happy to know that the case has been dismissed by a judge in New York, putting an end to months of legal battles and controversy.
In this article, we’ll dive into the background of the lawsuit against Shakira and explore what this ruling means for her career and reputation.
So sit back, relax, and let’s get started!
Background of the Lawsuit Against Shakira
Let’s delve into the backstory of why Shakira was hit with a $100 million lawsuit.
It all started in 2012 when Shakira’s song ‘Loca’ became a hit. However, the music was not original and was allegedly plagiarized from Dominican songwriter Ramon Arias Vásquez.
The songwriters claimed that they were never contacted by Shakira or her team for permission to use their work.
This led to a lengthy legal battle that lasted nine years. In March 2021, a New York judge dismissed the lawsuit against Shakira, stating that there wasn’t enough evidence to prove plagiarism.
The judge also noted that the plaintiffs waited too long before filing the complaint.
Despite this outcome, it’s important for artists to properly credit their sources and obtain permission before using someone else’s work. It can prevent costly lawsuits and protect artistic integrity in the industry.
The Judge’s Ruling and Its Implications
It’s worth noting that the ruling in this case could have significant implications for future copyright infringement lawsuits. The judge dismissed the $100 million lawsuit against Shakira, stating that the plaintiff failed to prove that Shakira copied his work. This ruling sends a clear message that mere similarities between two works are not enough to prove copyright infringement.
The judge also pointed out that the plaintiff’s expert witness did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims. This is a reminder of how crucial it is for plaintiffs to have strong evidence when making their case in court. Simply claiming that someone copied your work is not enough; you need concrete proof to convince a judge or jury.
Overall, this ruling highlights how challenging it can be to win a copyright infringement lawsuit. It underscores the importance of having strong evidence and legal representation throughout the entire process.
For Shakira, this decision means she can continue making music without fear of facing major financial penalties for alleged copyright violations.
Conclusion
Well done! You’ve just read about the dismissal of a $100 million lawsuit against Shakira.
As you may recall, the suit was filed by a former partner who claimed he helped launch her career and was entitled to a portion of her earnings. However, the judge ruled in favor of Shakira, stating there was no evidence to support his claims.
This ruling is likely to be seen as a victory for Shakira and her legal team as it effectively clears her name from any wrongdoing. It also sends a message that baseless lawsuits won’t be tolerated in the courts.
Overall, this decision serves as a reminder that one should always seek legal advice before entering into any business partnerships or agreements to avoid such disputes in the future.
Founder and Creator of Singersroom.com and IncredibleWork.com. Follow me on Instagram at @gary.gentles.
