The music video for âS&Mâ has been a nightmare for Rihanna. After dealing with bans in 11 countries and online, the R&B star is now facing a legal suit from famed photographer David LaChapelle amid allegations the raunchy new video was “directly derived” from images he shot.
In newly revealed court documents, LaChapelle is suing Rihanna for allegedly copying eight of his works, including a shot in which she poses against a blue background with a piece of candy on her tongue. The lawsuit, made public on Monday, February 14, states, “The music video is directly derived from and substantially similar to the LaChapelle works.”
The suit goes on to accuse the “Only Girl” hitmaker of copying the “composition, total concept, feel, tone, mood, theme, colors, props, settings, decors, wardrobe and lighting” of his pictures in her promo, which was directed by Melina Matsoukas.
LaChapelle, who has worked for top publications Rolling Stone, Vanity Fair and GQ, is demanding unspecified damages.
âS&Mâ is lifted from Rihannaâs latest album âLoud,â which is in stores now.
Rihanna is no stranger to controversy, but her latest scandal might be her biggest yet. The singer has been sued over the music video for her hit song ‘S&M’ due to its sexually explicit nature and alleged copyright infringement. This case could have drastic consequences for both Rihanna and the industry as a whole. Read on to learn more about this lawsuit against one of pop culture’s most powerful figures.
The release of ‘S&M’ in 2011 proved to be quite controversial, with some even referring to it as “the ultimate ode to sadomasochism”. The accompanying music video was equally provocative, featuring images of bondage gear and suggestive dancing. These visuals were enough to land Rihanna in hot water with photographer Philipp Paulus who claims that many elements from his photographs were used without permission or credit in the video production.
Paulus filed suit seeking damages from Rihanna and those involved in the creation of the music video, claiming that he did not give any authorization for them to use his copyrighted material. If successful, this legal action could set an important precedent for all artists when it comes to using other people’s work without permission – regardless if they are famous singers like Rihanna or casual photographers like Paulus himself.
Background Information
The controversy involving Rihanna’s ‘S&M’ video began when it was released in 2011. The powerful and sexually charged music video pushed the boundaries of what had been accepted by mainstream media, causing an uproar among fans and critics alike. People were shocked at how far Rihanna went with her visuals, which some deemed to be too explicit for public consumption.
In response to the backlash, a group of Brazilian lawyers filed suit against Rihanna on behalf of children who they claimed had been exposed to inappropriate content through the video. They argued that minors should not have access to such material without parental consent or supervision. This prompted a court case between the plaintiffs and producers of the video, as well as MTV Brazil, where it was first aired.
Ultimately, after much legal wrangling and debate over whether or not censorship laws had been violated, a judge ruled that there was no violation and dismissed the lawsuit. However, this didn’t stop people from debating about whether or not artists like Rihanna need to take more care in creating their work so that it doesn’t offend anyone unnecessarily.
Legal Implications
The lawsuit against Rihanna raised important questions about the limits of artistic expression and freedom of speech. On one hand, it is understandable that people felt uncomfortable with some of the more explicit images in the video; however, we must also consider whether or not censorship laws can be applied to art without infringing on an artist’s right to express themselves.
Ultimately, while there are certain restrictions placed on artists when they create their work in order to protect minors from inappropriate content, these rules should not be so strict as to stifle creativity. In other words, a balance needs to be struck between allowing for creative freedom and protecting viewers from potentially offensive material.
This case highlights the need for artists to consider how their work may affect different audiences before releasing it into the world. It is ultimately up to them to decide what kind of message they want to send through their art – but if they choose something controversial, they should always remember that there could be legal implications as well.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it seems that Rihanna has made a misstep with the ‘S&M’ video. The legal implications of this are far-reaching, and could even have ramifications for other videos released by artists in the future. It’s clear that she failed to take into account certain aspects of copyright law when creating her video, which eventually led to such a controversial lawsuit being brought against her.
Despite this setback, I believe Rihanna will be able to learn from this experience and move on. She is an incredibly talented artist who has created some amazing pieces of work over the years; there’s no reason why she can’t continue doing so despite what happened here. With any luck, she’ll make sure her next project follows all applicable laws before releasing it – something that would benefit not just herself, but countless other artists as well.
Overall, while this situation was unfortunate for both parties involved, we should still strive to appreciate Rihanna’s creative achievements and look forward to seeing what else she comes up with in the future.
Since 2005, Singersroom has been the voice of R&B around the world. Connect with us via social media below.
